Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Go and check out the Christians Discuss Forum for committed Christians at  http://www.christians-discuss.com

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"  (Read 48240 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
"Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« on: August 02, 2012, 07:20:49 PM »

Quote from: Email from Amazing Facts dated August 2, 2012

In spite of a clear and heartfelt appeal from Ted Wilson, world president of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the Columbia Union Conference voted on July 29, 2012, to ordain women as pastors.

This historic action creates a doctrinal rift between the eight Mid-Atlantic conferences and the majority of the world church. Elder Wilson cautioned this divisive vote could produce “many grave consequences” and lead to fragmentation and disunity.

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.

The Pacific Union Conference is scheduled to consider a similar vote on August 19 in Southern California. If you are opposed to North American Conferences separating theologically from the world church:
The petition and growing body of information will be presented to all the NAD and GC leaders prior to the August 19 vote.

Visit Christ or Culture for continuing updates …
Logged

Murcielago

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1274
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2012, 07:54:43 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.
Logged

SDAminister

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 233
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2012, 08:01:08 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago,
I would be interested if you or anyone else could present the documentation on the December 5, 1881 vote where the GC in session approved the ordination of women. This would go a long way towards clearing the air about our church's past history on this issue.
Much thanks,
SDAminister
Logged

Murcielago

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1274
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2012, 08:03:34 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago,
I would be interested if you or anyone else could present the documentation on the December 5, 1881 vote where the GC in session approved the ordination of women. This would go a long way towards clearing the air about our church's past history on this issue.
Much thanks,
SDAminister
And how about any documentation regarding EGW, and ither women of that time being ordained pastors? Would that also clear up anything?
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2012, 08:22:59 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago,
I would be interested if you or anyone else could present the documentation on the December 5, 1881 vote where the GC in session approved the ordination of women. This would go a long way towards clearing the air about our church's past history on this issue.
Much thanks,
SDAminister
And how about any documentation regarding EGW, and ither women of that time being ordained pastors? Would that also clear up anything?

One of my complaints has been the misinformation going around in support of WO. The alleged 1881 vote is just one example. Out of 40 resolutions presented to that GC Session, the only one not voted was the one in favor of WO. The CUC ad hoc committee report stated that it was actually voted, I pointed out the problem to J. David Newman, he acknowledged the mistake, he wrote the chairman of the committee requesting that the report be corrected, and the report was corrected.

I do not know of one single woman that was ordained, but would appreciate being given some actual names to research the facts about.
Logged

Gregory

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 964
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2012, 08:24:11 PM »

Was Ellen White ordained?

Elle White was given tehe credentials of an ordained minister for years.  She was listed as such in the official records of the denominaiton.  She was never ordained in a public (or private) ceremoney in whichothers laid their hands upon her.

So, those are the facts.  Nowthe question is, how do you intrepret them.

1)  I say she was ordained because she had the credentials.

2) Others say she was not because there never was any kind of a ceremoney in which people laid hands upon her.


Take your pick.  Both sides have valid points.


Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2012, 08:36:08 PM »

Was Ellen White ordained?

Elle White was given tehe credentials of an ordained minister for years.  She was listed as such in the official records of the denominaiton.  She was never ordained in a public (or private) ceremoney in whichothers laid their hands upon her.

So, those are the facts.  Nowthe question is, how do you intrepret them.

1)  I say she was ordained because she had the credentials.

2) Others say she was not because there never was any kind of a ceremoney in which people laid hands upon her.


Take your pick.  Both sides have valid points.


You are ignoring the part where the term ordained was crossed out on one of the her certificates, and also on a form that she had to fill out she put an "X" in the space where it asked if the person was ordained, thus indicating that she did not consider herself an ordained minister.

Is there some reason you left those facts out?
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

SDAminister

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 233
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2012, 08:38:19 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago,
I would be interested if you or anyone else could present the documentation on the December 5, 1881 vote where the GC in session approved the ordination of women. This would go a long way towards clearing the air about our church's past history on this issue.
Much thanks,
SDAminister
And how about any documentation regarding EGW, and ither women of that time being ordained pastors? Would that also clear up anything?

All documentation helps. But could we start with the 1881 vote please? Otherwise, we are dependent upon what you twice referred to as "my understanding". Question is: How did you come to understand these things?

Go ahead and either have you or someone else show us what happened in 1881. Is it as you say it is?

Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2012, 08:39:42 PM »

Some refer to the wording as it came from the resolutions committee, that it be voted that women could be ordained. As is done on occasions, someone moved that certain items first go through a committee, and that was voted, as I understand it. The other resolutions went through their committees and were approved by the general assembly with the wording from the committees, but the motion of ordaining women never came back to the floor. Some have suggested that the matter is still with the committee. It has often been said that the way to get rid of something is to refer it to a committee, because it can remain there forever.
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2012, 08:42:02 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago, these historical points have been discussed ad nauseam on other sites.

You might want to check some of them out before just regurgitating liberal SDA talking points.

See the info in my above post on Ellen White's "ordination".

In December, 1881, the GC definitely did not approve women's ordination.  Check your sources again.
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

Johann

  • Guest
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2012, 08:50:22 PM »

Was Ellen White ordained?

Elle White was given tehe credentials of an ordained minister for years.  She was listed as such in the official records of the denominaiton.  She was never ordained in a public (or private) ceremoney in whichothers laid their hands upon her.

So, those are the facts.  Nowthe question is, how do you intrepret them.

1)  I say she was ordained because she had the credentials.

2) Others say she was not because there never was any kind of a ceremoney in which people laid hands upon her.


Take your pick.  Both sides have valid points.


You are ignoring the part where the term ordained was crossed out on one of the her certificates, and also on a form that she had to fill out she put an "X" in the space where it asked if the person was ordained, thus indicating that she did not consider herself an ordained minister.

Is there some reason you left those facts out?

The card where the word "ordained" is crossed out, is one exhibition at Elmshaven, where I saw it last time I was there. It is remarkable, that while other items on this card is filled in with ink, the word ordained has a very thin line over it, not in ink like the other items, but a very weak pencil. Since nothing is crossed out on the other two copies still available of the card, there is a strong suspicion that that pencil line has been added at a much later date.

EGW has written elsewhere when and where she was ordained by God.
Logged

Murcielago

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1274
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2012, 10:04:59 PM »

Founded in part by Ellen White, the Adventist Church has always supported women being active in a broad spectrum of ministry. Yet the Sunday vote represents a major departure from the historic Adventist position that the Scriptures only support men being ordained as pastors.
Is Amazing Facts being entirely honest in this statement? From my understanding of church history, the SDA church historically ordained women, including Ellen White, and this practice continued until after her death. It is also my understanding that on December 5, 1881, the GC in session approved the ordination of women. It would then seem that Amazing Facts has their information inverted.

Murcielago, these historical points have been discussed ad nauseam on other sites.

You might want to check some of them out before just regurgitating liberal SDA talking points.

See the info in my above post on Ellen White's "ordination".

In December, 1881, the GC definitely did not approve women's ordination.  Check your sources again.
I will.
Logged

christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 345
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2012, 11:20:43 PM »

Was Ellen White ordained?

Elle White was given tehe credentials of an ordained minister for years.  She was listed as such in the official records of the denominaiton.  She was never ordained in a public (or private) ceremoney in whichothers laid their hands upon her.

So, those are the facts.  Nowthe question is, how do you intrepret them.

1)  I say she was ordained because she had the credentials.

2) Others say she was not because there never was any kind of a ceremoney in which people laid hands upon her.


Take your pick.  Both sides have valid points.


You are ignoring the part where the term ordained was crossed out on one of the her certificates, and also on a form that she had to fill out she put an "X" in the space where it asked if the person was ordained, thus indicating that she did not consider herself an ordained minister.

Is there some reason you left those facts out?

The card where the word "ordained" is crossed out, is one exhibition at Elmshaven, where I saw it last time I was there. It is remarkable, that while other items on this card is filled in with ink, the word ordained has a very thin line over it, not in ink like the other items, but a very weak pencil. Since nothing is crossed out on the other two copies still available of the card, there is a strong suspicion that that pencil line has been added at a much later date.

EGW has written elsewhere when and where she was ordained by God.
So let me understand this properly if I might. Evil men in the conference years later marked out the word ordained, to keep women from being ordained at a later date? Dog if only they had used an thick ink instead of a pencil. Do you have any idea who did this dastardly deed?
Logged

Gregory

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 964
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2012, 02:27:11 AM »

Artiste asked:
Quote
You are ignoring the part where the term ordained was crossed out on one of the her certificates, and also on a form that she had to fill out she put an "X" in the space where it asked if the person was ordained, thus indicating that she did not consider herself an ordained minister.

Is there some reason you left those facts out?

You correctly say that the word "ordained" is crossed out on one of the credentials that exists.  It is not known as to who crossed that word out.  Ther is no evidence to support the idea that EGW crossed it out.  Just as there is no evidence to suplport the idea that someone else crossed it out.  Someone, who is not knwon crossed it out.  That is all we know.

So, as ther is no evidence as to who crossed it ou, the fact that it is crossed out has little to know value.  Probably the best that could be said is that some unknown person wanted to make a statement that EGW asas not ordained.  IOW, they took the position that as she was not ordained in a ceremony where people laid hands on her, she was not ordained in their thinking.

Also, we donot know the time when that word was crossed out.  It could have been crossed out after her deathl.

What we do know is that the word "ordained" was crossed out on only one of the cirtificates that we have.  It was not crosssed out on any of the others, of which I beleive we have two.  So, if you say that EGW crossed it out, I would ask you why did she not cross that word out out on the others?

Logged

Gregory

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 964
Re: "Adventist Union Rejects World Church Policy"
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2012, 02:35:07 AM »

Christian asked:
Quote
So let me understand this properly if I might. Evil men in the conference years later marked out the word ordained, to keep women from being ordained at a later date? Dog if only they had used an thick ink instead of a pencil. Do you have any idea who did this dastardly deed?

In my opinion, there is to much attributing malice and evil intent in the posts that are being made here.

Let us say that someone other than EGW crossed the word"ordained" out on the one certificate of the three (?) that we have.  O.K., so what?   If that happened, there is no evidence to support the idea that the person who did it was evil.  In fact, there is no evidence to support the idea that the one who did it was a male.  It could have been a female.  There is no evidence to support the idea that the one who did  it did so in an attempt to keep women from being ordained in 2012, or any other time.

Whoever did it could simply have done so because they personally believed that she was not ordained.

Folks, we ned to stop attributing malice and evil when there is no evidence to support the idea of malice and evil.


« Last Edit: August 03, 2012, 04:50:29 AM by Gregory »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up