Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990  (Read 20326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cindy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 567
  • "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good"
    • 3A Talk Forum
Re: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990
« Reply #45 on: January 09, 2009, 08:03:51 AM »
my oopsie..
please remove.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2009, 08:20:47 AM by Ian »
Logged

GRAT

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 324
Re: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990
« Reply #46 on: January 09, 2009, 10:17:58 AM »
Ian - Crystal has never stated anything as fact that I can remember.  She asked questions.  Some things I choose to ignore as there is enough that is documented to convince me.
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990
« Reply #47 on: January 09, 2009, 03:44:47 PM »

I received two complete copies of the 3ABN 2007 Annual Report.  If anyone needs it, please PM me.  Fran - you're a given!!
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990
« Reply #48 on: January 09, 2009, 05:21:21 PM »
Thank you Snoopy!
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: 3ABN's 2007 Form 990
« Reply #49 on: January 11, 2009, 10:05:09 AM »
I still haven't had a chance to review the 2007 Annual Report in detail, but I did notice one interesting thing.  Remember the $1.1M in legal fees from the IRS Form 990??  In the Annual Report they are referred to as "Professional Fees"!!  Now, why the change?  Are they trying to hide the fact that they spent over $1M of donor funds "defending the truth"?  Why try to camouflage that?  Why not just call it what it is?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »