Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14   Go Down

Author Topic: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest  (Read 67806 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« on: August 21, 2009, 05:04:48 AM »

 




Michelle Obama's staff makes: $1,256,700.00. That is excluding 6 people we do not know their salary. This does not include anything else she spends, her trips, etc. How outrageous is that??? When our country is in the trouble we are in...This is beyond belief and I say should be stopped..Send this to your congress critters and tell them to stop the  funding for Michelle Obama....  Virginia Brooks




Check snopes http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp
Mrs. Bush had 16 staff  with “first Lady” in their title. Not that I’m excusing Mrs. O, it’s all outrageous but the Republicans were no better at saving my money than the Dems!
Nancy Gail Falster
903.629.3034
 www.falsterfarm.com
http://www.southerngrace.biz
Excerpt:
There has never been anyone in the White House at any time that has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush, 16; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President's own pocket.
Subject: outrageous

This will really infuriate you!

Michelle Obama's Attendants


No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she doesn't perform any official duties. But this hasn't deterred her from hiring an unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy her every request in the midst of the Great Recession. Just think Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary.



If you're one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Miz Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by John Q. Public:

1. $172,200- Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)

2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)

3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)

4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)

5. Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)

8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)

9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)

10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

11. Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)

13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)

14. Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)

15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)

16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)

17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)

18. Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)

19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)

21. Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)

22. Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)


There has never been anyone in the White House at any time that has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President's own pocket.

Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom travelled aboard Air Force One to Europe.


For the record, Laura Bush had one paid staff member.

(Well, Obama did promise to create jobs.)

and this is just the drop in the bucket Christian!!
 
« Last Edit: August 21, 2009, 05:14:25 AM by tinka »
Logged

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2009, 01:39:36 PM »

.....and your point is?  This doesn't need to be defended or even explained.  She has staff......the entire staff only makes $1+ mill and there are how many of them?  What, her husband can create jobs, but not in the White house....work is work, right?  ANd most importantly where you posting outrage when Laura Bush had large staff.  Your article says Laura bush had 16 staffers, are you saying 15 of them were volunteers? Or just disagreeing with your own source?  Are you suggesting that they add to the unemployment line by reducing the size of the White House staff? 
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2009, 02:04:10 PM »

fuuunnniiieeee.... :ROFL: What more can you expect for justifications


The person that wrote this was Dem. and did the Laura Bush scenario sort of in anger like you where you read 16. She was replying back to the article.  Actually at the end you would see the correct no of Bush is one according if you go into research and find the orginal reports from white house staff or are they lying??.
This Obama staff is milking the system hired by or provided by Obama or Michelle. This is disgusting. As far as the shorts go, all previous first ladies are cultured and refined to not be in public like this when they hold this position.  If you want to know class, check out the queen of England and follow suit.  Can't you just see Elizabeth prancing around in shorts.  She is a refined and cultured lady Queen. Our American office needs the same respect.   I will let you find out what mob pants are and I am suprised you do not know. I about did a flip when MO went to the dance in that horrible white bazoon.  At least it was funny. Money cannot make her class until she gets it herself. or she needs to hire more staff with better suggestions. That now is my own opinion of her social look along with many others.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2009, 02:23:56 PM by tinka »
Logged

christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 345
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2009, 07:46:31 PM »

Lady, you really have some deep seated problems, you used the queen of England as an example? Dont you realize that they are the most wasteful useless bunch of people. If Michelle used them as an example she would have a 100 X more help. Honestly, you need to check your history cause some problems are really deep rooted and can only be corrected upon examination. I bet one thing is for sure and maybe this is what is infuriating you, she is the best looking first lady we have ever had. I think the reason that the other ladies did not wear shorts is because they would be so ugly that it would disgrace the entire United States. As far as what class is, what makes you and exspert on class.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2009, 08:18:17 PM »

You need to pay more attention to what is being said and read what and how words are stated.  No body said a thing about being wasteful in England or how their system is. I was talking about the class of dress that is in total respect of office. I am not agreeable with their system at all, but evidently you ARE as you back this monstrous Obama Socialistic, healthcare take down and all the rest of his agenda the same as England has and Canada. No MO is not the most beautiful first lady of which is a matter of opinion and instead if you take off that makeup you can get a true look.  She plain does not know how to dress that accents all her bad parts.  The make up does a lot for her if that is what your looking at. Jackie was class and Laura Bush.  Hiliary was more masculine then lady. Of the women on scene the most beautiful is Sarah!!  What makes any body a expert on class is to know Bibical what is modest, neatly and beautifully styled into simplicity and according to your words you don't know what that is. I did not see that in the white Bazoon, funny looking, flyaway, rediculous dance or ball gown or what ever it was to portray anything at all except lack of intelligance in dress.  Style and class are too different things of which I am seeing you would not understand. Example.  Mob pants are a style. so is the grundge look.
Logged

christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 345
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2009, 11:09:45 PM »

Obviously, you are not reading what you are writing. Often people live in a delusional world based on their likes and dislikes. The dress in the bible is not the same dress as today, but because you are older, that is my guess, you like the queen of Englands dress. As far as healthcare goes, I am very qualified to answer that question especially as it deals with insurance companies. You have no idea what you are talking about; do you realize the millions of dollars we pay to executives and the like at the insurance companies? Do you understand the billions of dollars we pay for executives and share holders of insurance and drug companies. Do you have any idea of the amount of people that do not have insurance, or adequate coverage? Do you not realize the thousands a year that are forced into bankrupcy because of catastrophic illnesses or just he inability to pay? I can bet you don't, my guess is you are so against anything the Obama's do and for that reason you will allow many to go uninsured or get dropped by the insurance companies.---You place style over substance because you are brainwashed by those in the position of power that dress up and then strip you naked. You talked about Michelles makeup without realizing that Sarah, Jackie, and Laura bush all wear makeup and would look like a scarecrow without it. You started your post talking about all the money used by Michelle's people but what about your queeny. Then you have to call Hillary masculine; I wonder what you look like? In anycase I do believe that Healthcare should be a right for all people, I believe Jesus would want it that way.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2009, 06:29:14 AM »

Your are so right about the insurance companies and it amazes me that you can not detect the rest of the story. If Obama was in his right field of agenda this is where he needed to start his clean up.  with the insurance not turn America into socialism as you do not understand what that will do.

You completely jump around like a  :rabbit: caused by your own justification of everything they do. Let me tell you I am older and was taught that elegance and simplicity in dress is Biblical. The only mention of the Queen is because of her ability for elegance. I did not mention her smoking of which is shocking but it is never done in public. I also stated that the president of the U.S and first lady should have the same respect.  Even his beer drinking should be kept out of eye as that also states wheat else you can depend on wrongly done too. Usually people that dress flamboyancy have hang ups. Their character is then determined as you may have caught on as the the media and the same everywhere. It does not matter how you hit as I compare to the standards that are put before us especially. Then you must realize you are blinded by racism in their quest for all equality in financial.  Problem is not all have the ability to handle finances white or black. Check out the handouts and then look at the spending on ciggies, booze, prostitution, gambling (is a big one on the lottery where they still are looking for something for nothing) on and on and on. So look again start where the problem is (the insurance companies) not make the rest of us that work suffer financially in your idea of a "man works so the others eat theory".  again this is not Biblical but "man" directing in different directions God's plan.  I believe it is me that keeps focused on facts and the political experiences we have been through. You need to age a bit more and study more it appears.   I do know some that have adopted the theory of just being American and free (so far) in thought and deeds and drop the culture of bygone days. That is what creates the racism to still linger. I do not want racism and will ignore any fact of it as I believe in American only with no difference. I will not stand for any of Obamas agenda that take away our American way of life that will be gone if people will not stand up. But somehow I think that is starting to happen for a bit anyway but prophecy is coming. Are you not Adventists to know that??.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2009, 08:34:19 AM »

Here are what outside people are talking about and distributing everywhere. I am not saying I believe in any of this but this is why evengelicals are looking deep. I do not know anything of Bible code and do not put in or take away. But just take a glimpse at utube links and read what the outside people really think. I do not have proof either way. But yes an uprising is coming because this country was founded on God's principles or it would not have the dead honored for freedom in soils across the lands.

F BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HAS NOTHING TO HIDE, THEN WHY DOES HE NOT PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS BELOW::::?????? MAKE SURE YOU READ ESPECIALLY THE LAST ARTICLE HERE...GOOD ONE...VIRGINIA MAY; BROOKS
Why are these Barack Hussein Obama documents off-limits to Americans?
http://countusout.wordpress.com/

1. Certified copy of original birth certificate
2. Columbia University transcripts
3. Columbia thesis paper
4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Harvard University transcripts
6. Illinois State Senate records
7. Illinois State Senate schedule
8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11. Occidental College Transcripts
12. Parent’s marriage Certificate
13. Record of baptism
14. Selective Service registration records
15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16. Scholarly articles
17. List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
18. Punahou grade school records
************************************************************
If you watched the bible codes series, you can relate to this video.....I am NOT saying this is true of Obama,...but the codes match up...Shirl
 
Along with everything else comes a very interesting video concerning 7 strange coincidences about obama...They may be nothing more than just "coincidences ", but some things in life just can't be so easily explained away and this is why I am sending this video out to everyone in my patriot address book.....You decide for yourself, truth or just coincidence!!!....bill
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UOKTNFMgQ8
 
*************************************************************************
Give this to your pastor...!!!
This POTUS covers Jesus, denies we are a Christina nation, refused to participate in the National Day of Prayer, stays our of church and says and does other acts against Christianity, yet he has the audacity to ask CHRISTIAN leaders to help him sell a DEATHcare plan to the American people...?  Hopefully the Christian leaders aren't as veiled as are his followers.   You all got the news about this this past week...it was all over the news about his teleconference call to those 140,000 church leaders to help him sell his deathcare plan to us.  Read on.......
 
http://www.desertconservative.com/category/actsbills/
a.. Home
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Obama's DESPERATE ACTS TO FURTHER SOCIALISM IN AMERICA
Published by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr. on Aug 23rd, 2009
Submitted by: Marie Woods
 
OBAMA MAKES A POLITICAL BOOTY CALL TO THE CHURCH.
BY Doug Giles
 
What's this? Obama now needs the Church-which he's been regularly dissing-to come to his aid and help "prod Congress" to pass his Health Scare Deform Swill? Well, la-di-da. In the words of the angry and bad serial dater, Alanis Morissette, "Isn't it ironic, don't 'cha think? A little too ironic, and yeah, I really do think."
Barack's call to believers this past week is the political equivalent of the phenomenon randy kiddos in our culture refer to as a "booty call."
For those not familiar with the term "booty call," it's the anxious, last minute, late in the game, last ditch, frantic and insincere BS-laden personal gratification phone call made by a manipulative, narcissistic man to a gullible and needy girl who has been, heretofore, summarily blown off by said guy for other girls.
 
 
Yep, in his pursuit of "better things," the dude, unsuccessful in his new venture, will once again return to the girl he knows is easy and still hopeful that the load of crap he's about to spew, in his desperate call to gratify his lusts, will finally come true. Fueled on false hope and therefore open to lies, the gullible girl easily caves to the caller's wishes-only to be left in the dust after the guy gets what he wants, leaving the booty callee feeling very used and deceived. This is exactly what Obama be doin'. True dat.
In a move that would make Saul Alinsky proud, Obama is now calling on Christians for help. As the Church Lady would say, "Well isn't that special?" I wonder why he didn't call me? I'm a Christian. I have a weekly column tens of thousands far and wide read. I have a radio show on the IRN/USA Radio Network. Hmmm. That's weird. No call. Any who . . .
Let me get this straight, Mr. President, in regard to who you're calling: Would this be the same group of Christians you've been ticking off for the last several months?
Are you, Barack, reaching out your hand to the religious folks you backhanded in San Francisco during the election, calling them "bitter and clingy?" Oops!
Is it the same group of Christians that took offense at you covering up Christian symbols when you spoke at Georgetown University? Forgot about that one, didn't you? We didn't.
Would it also be the group of Christians that didn't dig you saying America isn't a Christian nation while on your America Sucks European Apology Tour? I know, nobody's perfect, eh?
Is this the same flock that does not, how would you say . . . "embrace" . . . your radical stances on abortion and isn't too cool with your proposed federal funding for abortion in your unread Health Care legislation?
 
Are these Christians the very ones whom the darling liberal organization, the ACLU, regularly threatens to sue when they pray over a meal at school or say something remotely conservative from the pulpit, or on TV, or on the radio? Shouldn't Barry Lynn be on TV right now moaning and groaning about the separation of church and state? Where are you Barry, you little Nancy boy? C'mon Lynn, condemn the president, you gutless girlfriend. Sorry, I got in the flesh there. Let me resume my query.
Would this be the faithful crowd your twerps have referred to as the Taliban, Nazis, unpatriotic mobs, or the folks the Department of Homeland Security advises should be watched for potential terrorist attacks against our God-blessed nation? Huh?
Lastly, is this the same group of Christians whom Pelosi, the Left-bent mainstream media, liberal Hollywood, the blogosphere and liberal comedians summarily whiz on at every opportunity? Would that be the bunch you'd wish to cheerlead for Thy cause? Because if it be, B-HO, you might find yourself SOL, namely, sure outta luck. You want us to support you? Yeah, and people in hell want ice water. Ain't gonna happen.
Obama is using the God mallet in his awkward, frantic attempts to sway the masses, the same mallet that clobbered Bush when he used it. Come on, MSNBC, Obama's talking like a theocrat. Go get him! He's yammering on about God, morals and sin! WTH? Why are you so silent, Bill Maher? Christopher Hitchens, where's your outrage, old chap?
Obama's calling Christians. Now that's funny, I don't care who you are. What's next? Is B-HO going to call the NRA for support? Or maybe he's going to give the Jewish community a jingle (because this Hamas-endorsed president is no pal of Israel). What? He already did? I told you so. It's just a matter of time before our cocoa Chrysostom rings Lapierre for a little health care yak.
Regarding WWJD: Well, from what I gather from the Gospels, Jesus didn't heal everybody and was definitely no fan of the big government that eventually killed Him. Selah. And if we're going to ponder His divine thoughts about health care, what about His other stuff like salvation, sin, sacrifice and obedience? Do I here crickets chirping? Dipsticks.
And lastly-forgive me for rambling-my advice to pastors contemplating prodding congress to pass this 1,100-page diaper wipe: I hope you're close with Obama because you might need him for a bailout. Yep, I'm afraid that if your congregation finds out about your giddiness over His Highness' health edict you're going to see a drop in your attendance and a big slash in your tithe when they discover you stand behind this socialistic mess.
Church, understand this: What Obama did this past week in giving us a buzz was a booty call. Nothing more and nothing less than a call for relief from someone who is not getting what he wants to those he thinks are stupid and thus easy.
 
Written by Doug Giles
 
 

Logged

Little Grasshopper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2009, 04:52:11 PM »


IF BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HAS NOTHING TO HIDE, THEN WHY DOES HE NOT PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS BELOW::::??????

You know, of course, that many of  George W. Bush's records are missing, too, such as the ones covering his service -- or lack of it -- in the National Guard.   It is believed by many that  W.  went AWOL. 

As for health insurance,  I don't think a person's health should be at the sole dictate of private business.  A person -- or their health -- should not be put up for auction to the highest bidder in a private market.

My Canadian friends think the Canadian system works just fine.













Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2009, 05:22:24 PM »

Grasshopper,
Maybe your health has not been critical enough to see Canada's system!  according to friends I know in England and people from Canada that are speaking out their health program if critical are waiting in lines.  Friends in England could not get help in time for their aged parents. Both needed care they did not get.

Have you really looked into the bill or bits of it. If insurance companies were made clean and in control that would be the route to go. All other countries have failed miserable and if critical they come to America for care immediately to save their lives.  Hawaii's plan failed Trying to do the same.

Geo. Bush records has no amount of questions as that of Obama. Obama's are the ones that matter as his agenda is that of a dictator. If you  think  that I am the only one that thinks on these actions, let me tell you that it is very scary and I mean scary as the people are starting  rise up in all areas. The militias are gaining in power and numbers. They are not going to sit down for this and that is what I fear happening as we are told that there will be trouble as never before. I just discovered this today and just letting people see the inner parts that are brewing as fact. I don't especially like putting this out but here is what you can analyze for yourself. Pretty scary stuff to me. I knew that the backbone of America will not give up freedom without a fight. Is it soon, now, tomorrow, or when?? And you realize I am not writing any of the above. Just letting people know the inner details of what some of the public does not pay attention to. I will come back and post a copy of Militia on youtube.
Info to put into search after you get on YOUtube.

Ohio Militia - Freedom fighters or future terrorist ? Go to Youtube and see what outsiders are doing about this!

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOuo2TwF9ug [1]
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWpRnrPnj5Y [2
« Last Edit: August 24, 2009, 05:56:59 PM by tinka »
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2009, 05:51:58 PM »

Also the Bushes stand for "New world Order" of which we are against for America.  Like we say that neither side in this day and time Will turn the events that will soon come. Of course unless all repent and be save like Nineveh. Oh how I wish and what a miracle that would be. It just does not appear to be possible as closed minds continually find justification for all evil that is done. Including within our own church.
Logged

christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 345
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2009, 04:52:32 AM »

     Fortunately for all of us there are only a few wackos out there. So now Obama is the Anti- Christ and even though you don't necessarily believe all of it you are passing it off as truth. Tinka, carry on and time will tell.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2009, 04:18:02 PM »

You seem to have difficulty adding thoughts and words that just are not there to peoples posts.
You accuse, while I just mentioned what is going on in reality. The reason the polls are going down is because people are waking up. Those posts are what other people put out because they are scared, worried, and starting to rise up. I was just pointing that out as it is scary to me too. I know what the anti-Christ is. Its been on this earth for sometime nowl
Logged

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2009, 12:13:28 PM »

First of all, Christian you are doing a great job, I don't need to say another thing regarding our current First Lady...basically she wears shorts because ......she can!  LOL!!  So....next......

Those records might not be available for public viewing, but I am sure they were checked and recheck with a fine toothed comb.  I have no doubt that there were some chomping at the bit to stop Obama when he was even thinking about running.  If they found nothing then.....there is nothing......do you really believe that the republicans would have stayed silent if they had something real to stop him?  I don't think so. They are serious about their racism,.  They have worked it out form every angle so that it sounds logical and reasonable.  Ripthe party to so many shreds, they had no choice but to eleect yet another black man as their chairman......just hilarious!

Health care.........for those of you who are sooooo short sighted......you are ALREADY paying for the uninsured, only by state.  Not just for Dr.'s appt. nor preventative procedure, but most often for critical care, because they have no insurance to see a Dr. to maintain the former.  Costing the states millions in medical care for those uninsured.  No system is perfect, but England neither Canada are looking to abandon their health care systems for ours.  theirs and many others work.  The Insurance companies are so used to having their way, that they are whining and crying about the change.  They ARE the death panels as they make life and death decisions every single day, and deny much needed care to protect their bottom line. 

Why aren't christians looking to the early church for their example here?  Everyone put in, and nobody went without.  Those who had more, gave more.  Those who had less, gave less, But ALL got what they needed.  I am convinced that it was this sense of community that help the church to grow as it did.  This is the example we are supposed to be following.  I am realy not understanding the religious right in this.  In terms of their politics, they are not at all Christ-like.  They adopt and lead in the selfish mindset of the republican party, rather than being the examples within that party and leading them into Christ's unselfish love. 
 
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: Michelle Obama in Discussion of Interest
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2009, 12:23:03 PM »

Actually the press is just not allowed to take pictures of the queen in her shorts.  it doesn't mean she doesn't wear them.  Diana did, and younger royals do.  Times change. And christian is right.  They are a HUGE burden on the UK's economy.  England hass to maintain at the very least(i believe there are more), two fully staffed homes for the Queen, Windsor and Buckingham Palace....at the country's expense, and they do not rule.  They are figure heads...the prime minister is equvalent to the president here in teh US.  NOT a good example, Tinka. This point,, tinka is nit picky at the very least, but speaks to the very level of hatred and envy.
fuuunnniiieeee.... :ROFL: What more can you expect for justifications


The person that wrote this was Dem. and did the Laura Bush scenario sort of in anger like you where you read 16. She was replying back to the article.  Actually at the end you would see the correct no of Bush is one according if you go into research and find the orginal reports from white house staff or are they lying??.
This Obama staff is milking the system hired by or provided by Obama or Michelle. This is disgusting. As far as the shorts go, all previous first ladies are cultured and refined to not be in public like this when they hold this position.  If you want to know class, check out the queen of England and follow suit.  Can't you just see Elizabeth prancing around in shorts.  She is a refined and cultured lady Queen. Our American office needs the same respect.   I will let you find out what mob pants are and I am suprised you do not know. I about did a flip when MO went to the dance in that horrible white bazoon.  At least it was funny. Money cannot make her class until she gets it herself. or she needs to hire more staff with better suggestions. That now is my own opinion of her social look along with many others.
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14   Go Up