News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.



Date Set for Both Trials of Tommy Shelton

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

anyman

Quote from: ex3abnemployee
I want to say that I do NOT hate Tommy Shelton, nor do I want to see him or his family destroyed.

X3,

To bad your once Christian position has been replaced with your current venom and glee about the current situation.

ex3abnemployee

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 10:13:07 PM
Quote from: ex3abnemployee
I want to say that I do NOT hate Tommy Shelton, nor do I want to see him or his family destroyed.

X3,

To bad your once Christian position has been replaced with your current venom and glee about the current situation.
Glee? I am just stating a fact. You and 3d are desperately trying to distract everyone from what is going to happen next month. Trying to twist what I post isn't going to stop the trial, either.
Duane Clem
It's not about religion, It's about a relationship

Johann

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 09:47:36 PM
You can try to minimize her testimony Johann, but that will not make it any less profound. You know she's right.

You did not inform us how many times this woman has switched sides, and under what circumstances.

anyman

X3,

So you are saying your original statement, c. Jan. 2007, still reflects your position?

anyman

Quote from: Johann on June 02, 2010, 10:31:40 PM
Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 09:47:36 PM
You can try to minimize her testimony Johann, but that will not make it any less profound. You know she's right.

You did not inform us how many times this woman has switched sides, and under what circumstances.

You can try to minimize her testimony, but it will not make it any less profound. You know she's right.

ex3abnemployee

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 10:34:35 PM
X3,

So you are saying your original statement, c. Jan. 2007, still reflects your position?
I'm not saying anything to you. My statement speaks for itself. It's not my problem if you don't have the capacity to comprehend.
Duane Clem
It's not about religion, It's about a relationship

Johann

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 10:35:51 PM
Quote from: Johann on June 02, 2010, 10:31:40 PM
Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 09:47:36 PM
You can try to minimize her testimony Johann, but that will not make it any less profound. You know she's right.

You did not inform us how many times this woman has switched sides, and under what circumstances.

You can try to minimize her testimony, but it will not make it any less profound. You know she's right.

Are you referring to her testimony about her conversation with Alyssa?

anyman

Johann,

Are you forgetting the truth she discovered in Scandinavia? And the testimony she brought home from her travels there?

tinka

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 09:59:08 PM
Quote from: tinka on June 02, 2010, 07:35:54 PM
Now who would Barbara Kerr be (although sounds familiar)

You have made it very clear that you have read everything written up to this point - how did you miss the name?

Quote from: tinka on June 02, 2010, 07:35:54 PM
Email me her phone no.

If you really have any interest at all in the truth - and that is debatable - you will
find it on your own. There are enough people registered here who can send you down the right path or even give you the number. If you want truth - seek it.

Is it possible that you know where to bring up the post of BK name. Evidently I did not put importance on connecting who was who on post except for yours after a while and just a couple of others. Probably because I don't know any personally other then tv where I shared my funds.

Johann

Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 11:05:30 PM
Johann,

Are you forgetting the truth she discovered in Scandinavia? And the testimony she brought home from her travels there?

Not at all, but that does not answer my question in connection with Alyssa. You ignore that completely.

Did BK ever divulge publicly what she discovered? Don't forget that I have been around there too, and I know what she discovered - probably much better than what you do. For your sake, and everybody else, it may pay to let things stay right there.

But if you think it is important, why don't you say what you think happened there?

Pat Williams

Quote from: ex3abnemployee on June 02, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 10:13:07 PM
Quote from: ex3abnemployee
I want to say that I do NOT hate Tommy Shelton, nor do I want to see him or his family destroyed.

X3,

To bad your once Christian position has been replaced with your current venom and glee about the current situation.
Glee? I am just stating a fact. You and 3d are desperately trying to distract everyone from what is going to happen next month. Trying to twist what I post isn't going to stop the trial, either.



Tinka and princessdi took this topic off course and brought up Linda, Nathan, etc... They were going back and forth about that first, and others can reply to what they post and claim.

Chastise them next time with your outrage and remind them, they need to be quiet as Tommy has a trial next month and nothing they say is going to stop it. As if we are even interested in doing that... Not. The courts are way more just and fair than you, Pickle, and your vindictive spiteful group are. I, myself, am glad Tommy has the opportunity to face his accusers, in an unbiased and just way, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

AFAIC, you continue to look silly, petty, and deperate yourself with all your melodrama and accusations.

Pat Williams

#71
Quote from: Johann on June 03, 2010, 04:32:37 AM
Quote from: anyman on June 02, 2010, 11:05:30 PM
Johann,

Are you forgetting the truth she discovered in Scandinavia? And the testimony she brought home from her travels there?

Not at all, but that does not answer my question in connection with Alyssa. You ignore that completely.

Did BK ever divulge publicly what she discovered? Don't forget that I have been around there too, and I know what she discovered - probably much better than what you do. For your sake, and everybody else, it may pay to let things stay right there.

But if you think it is important, why don't you say what you think happened there?

You claim, "I know what she discovered - probably much better than what you do but won't say" as that's best? For who's sake? and why? She was in Norway and getting treatments from Linda's and your Doctor Friend, Abrahamsen, wasn't she? How is that not important, and why should it be secret?

What ever happened to open and transparent, and the truth needs to be given to all? That's what this group keeps proclaiming and accusing 3ABN of not doing. At least that's what I have been reading for years.

Your evasive answers and games here make your signature "The truth can lose nothing by close investigation." look like some kind of poor joke to me. This just proves again to me how only partial truths are told here to give only the view you want to present, and people need to dig harder if they really want the whole story and not just depend on what they are told here.

tinka

#72
3D,
Your replies are glitched in your head. Not sure of anything you say is normal responses. You can't prove anything you say or answer unless you come up with "kool-aid" lingo.  I cannot imagine your responses of TS.  Your anger seems to be with Duane. what about the other victims too?? Let me tell you, the courts or jury is not going to have your sediments. Your sediments are your eternal glitch. Where is your proof of innocence? or are you waiting for pity to bestowed on this wretched human of evil deeds? Your pity should be for the wronged people.

So what is your version of truth that your claiming???
Your above post is almost presenting insinuations of the Dr??? or what BK discovered?

Have you forgotten your implying that LS lost custody. You just did not present the real thing either.

Pat Williams

#73
Quote from: tinka on June 03, 2010, 04:57:23 AM
3D,
Your replies are glitched in your head. Not sure of anything you say is normal responses. You can't prove anything you say or answer unless you come up with "kool-aid" lingo.  I cannot imagine your responses of TS.  Your anger seems to be with Duane. what about the other victims too?? Let me tell you, the courts or jury is not going to have your sediments. Your sediments are your eternal glitch. Where is your proof of innocence? or are you waiting for pity to bestowed on this wretched human of evil deeds? Your pity should be for the wronged people.

No, something is glitched in your head. You say you read all and then keep claiming I've said things, I never said, and have done things I never have. It's crazy, off base, and unwarranted, to me. I can't figure out if you are even for real here. You think I ever proclaimed him innocent? then go try and  find that quote. Maybe not finding it can convince you that you are confused here.

I expect the courts to be unbiased, impartial, fair,  establish the truth, and render justice for all. And that's all I have ever said about the case. I've never said guilty, nor not guilty. The court's will decide. Now, ff you have a problem with that, or think the courts don't share my "sediments"? Fine, must be that glitch, and that is your problem, not mine.

tinka

Quote from: tinka on June 03, 2010, 04:57:23 AM
3D,
Your replies are glitched in your head. Not sure of anything you say is normal responses. You can't prove anything you say or answer unless you come up with "kool-aid" lingo.  I cannot imagine your responses of TS.  Your anger seems to be with Duane. what about the other victims too?? Let me tell you, the courts or jury is not going to have your sediments. Your sediments are your eternal glitch. Where is your proof of innocence? or are you waiting for pity to bestowed on this wretched human of evil deeds? Your pity should be for the wronged people.

So what is your version of truth that your claiming???
Your above post is almost presenting insinuations of the Dr??? or what BK discovered?

Have you forgotten your implying that LS lost custody. You just did not present the real thing either.


Wait a minute here...Don't you call yourself 3ABN Defender.  Do you know where you are coming from???