Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Go and check out the Christians Discuss Forum for committed Christians at  http://www.christians-discuss.com

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?  (Read 11788 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

todd_vetter33

  • New Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« on: November 27, 2009, 11:29:48 AM »

"And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, we will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach." Isaiah 4:1.
  
Seven represents: Complete, All, finished, totality; complete cycle event aka creation, 7 last plagues, 7 years of good harvest, 7 years of famine
                                7 churches of Revelation called out for their flaws!
 
Woman represents: Church
 
“Shall take hold of one man”; represents how all churches in the end time will claim to follow Christ.
 
“We will eat our own bread”; (They reject the true Bread of life-Jesus and His teachings, see John 6:51, and prefer rather to "eat" their own false doctrines and traditions see Isaiah 8:20) This can apply to the 4 bible gospels if they are not every word that proceeded from the mouth of God!
 
'and wear our own apparel' (they also reject the pure, white robe of Christ's righteousness and prefer their own system of works and self-righteousness.
 
'only let us be called by Thy name' (they desperately, despite their rebellion against God’s Laws, want to be recognized as part of Christ's church, why?)
 
'to take away our reproach'.
Reproach:an expression of rebuke or disapproval a cause or occasion of blame, discredit, or disgrace


The reason I ask is due to the presentation of information shared at this link which appears to reveal the mystery of Babylon.  All the pages leading up to page 37 apprear to be objective truth based on the presentation of information.  They appear to validate the testimony presented on page 37 and if that testimony is true, then the entire world is of the spirit of anti-christ because they are missing the baptism of the spirit (Christ) within them.

Will you help me tear this study apart to see if any lie or half truth is presented since Half truths are Satan's deception if the holy spirit inspires truth from God.

here is the link to the study.
http://www.thedeathandresurection.com/pdf/the%20death%20and%20resurrection.pdf

I look forward to your help with this matter
« Last Edit: November 27, 2009, 11:33:31 AM by todd_vetter33 »
Logged

todd_vetter33

  • New Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Something New that I discovered today!
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2009, 10:31:24 PM »

Something new that I just discovered; this is awesome!

http://www.bombaxo.com/didascalia.html

on the tenth of the moon, on the second day of the week, (p. 92) the priests and elders of the people assembled and came to the court of Caiaphas the high priest; and they took counsel to apprehend Jesus and put him to death: but they feared, saying: Not in the festival, lest the people make a tumult [Mt 26.3-5]; for all men were hanging upon Him [Lk 19.48], and they held him for a prophet [Mt 21.46] on account of His miracles of healing which He did among them. But Jesus was that day in the house of Simon the leper [Mt 26.6], and we together with Him, and He related to us that which was about to happen to Him. But Judas went out privily from us, thinking that he would evade our Lord, and went to the house of Caiaphas where the chief priests and elders were assembled, and said to them: What will ye give me, and I will betray Him to you when I have found an occasion? But they appointed [[188]] and gave him thirty pieces of silver [Mt 26.15]. And he said to them: 'Make ready young men armed, because of His disciples, that if He go forth by night to a desert place I may come and lead you.' And they made ready the young men and prepared to seize Him. And Judas was watching, when he might find him an occasion to betray him

If Christ died on a Friday, It would have been the second day of the week for the tenth of the moon or Ten Nissan. See page 9 of the time for example. What is clear by this testimony is that it is placing the anointing in Bethany on the Evening of the tenth day of the first month since it's in reference to the upcoming Passover/crucifixion. For the possibility of a Friday crucifixion this would have been a Sunday Night (Gregorian time). This in turn according to the book of John would have placed the triumphal entry on a Monday if it happened the day after the anointing in Bethany. The Third century Christians had a great deal of confusion based on the written testimonies that existed in their time. This tells us that the 4 bible gospels we have today are not what was available to them in their day.

All through the Didascalia Apostolorum the Bishop appears to be quoting from Matt, Mark, Luke and John yet he had this perception of understanding which is not consistent with the traditional perceptions shared by much of Christianity today.

If Christ died on a Wednesday (see page 12 of time line) what we have is a piece of historical testimonial evidence illustrating that the anointing in Bethany occurred on the Evening of the tenth day. If Christ was crucified in 30 AD, this would have been the Evening of the Sabbath just as the Gospel of the twelve presents which gives credibility that the Gospel of the twelve predates the Didascalia Apostolorum which is said to have been written in the second to Third century. The Exodus 12 prophecy is able to then illustrate that this Bishop who wrote Didascalia Apostolorum was not baring true witness regarding the events when he claimed it was the Second day of the week. Exodus 12 prophecy and the historical evidence of it’s  fulfillment also highlights that the Gospel of John is not baring true witness by claiming the anointing in Bethany occurred 6 days before the Passover.  It exposes that Matthew and Mark are also not baring true witness by illustrating that the anointing in Bethany occurred two days before the Passover.

Gospel of the twelve however goes on to say that the triumphal entry occurred on the First day of the week and later in testimony added in a day transition in the middle of the Cleansing of the temple testimony or the Gospel of Twelve would have portrayed Jesus Crucifixion on a Thursday.

This time line illustrates very clearly how to use OT Prophecy as a light to the confusion of Christian written recorded history.

Very Respectfully,
God Bless
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2009, 10:10:18 AM »

Somebody is lying somewhere.
God is in control of what is truth and He surely would not let His truly dedicated people believe a lie that would go uncovered to the end of time by the Devil.

Take a chance on that belief if you wish-- but not me! The Bible is His Word and not Man"s!! God is responsible for His own Truth to man. The devil only comes up these side slots off the track. If man fails then it would be God's fault for not getting the truth across would'nt you say??? Now the Devil has a chance to enter back in on this theory.
Logged

todd_vetter33

  • New Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2009, 08:15:20 PM »

Regarding what is God's word per the new covenant.

Without the spirit of God re-united to the soul that is trapped in the temporary tabernacle (flesh), there is only existence and regeneration of the soul trapped in sin and darkness. There is no rest for the wicked, but the Righteous enter into rest.

I know I was born dead for the dead know nothing and what infant when born according to the flesh knows anything? It’s said that even Jesus, who was born according to the flesh, grew in the spirit as we all must. Any infant born according to the flesh suffers through the ignorance of sin and the experience of our existence. Sin is defiance or ignorance of the wisdom of God. Adam and Eve though made pure in the beginning, were in a state of ignorance hence their desire to give into sin by seeking an unknown promised wisdom by the serpent and master of the half truth lie.

We can exist an entire life time in the flesh and never truly live. This has been the case for man having a soul, without the spirit of God, throughout the ages. Having the soul re-united to the spirit of God is the only way to enter the kingdom of heaven (born again). Until then we simply exist and stumble through history and sin which over time bares witness to the darkness we are in without the wisdom and Law of God written on our hearts.

The day of Pentecost is the anniversary of the day Israel received the Law of God from the mouth of God (hence we can only live by every word that proceeded from the mouth of God). Pentecost is also the day the First fruits of Jesus received the spirit of God (Law written on the heart in spirit), It was at that moment they were children of God just as Jesus was a child begotten of the heavenly parent after his baptism of water (repentance) and spirit, making him a faithful witness and first born from the dead Rev 1:5. Jesus said that when we die we will be like the angels in heaven, We know John the Revelator was an angel, for when he bowed to the Angel while in vision, the angel warned against this by saying they were brothers and that he should worship God (The Heavenly Parent). The John of Revelation had not yet reached physical death, yet had already died to self and was born again in new life through Christ (The anointing of Spirit).

Because the flesh is simply a vessel that carries the soul, it's for this reason that God was quick to kill the flesh in the OT. It's the soul that God is interested in bringing out of the darkness of sin. It is stated that God knew us before we were born. This strongly implies a pre-existence of the soul before our existence in our current temporary tabernacle (flesh).

We see an example of this in the bible where John the Baptist did not know he was the return of Elijah even though he was a prophet who received the Word of the Lord in the manner of the old Covenant (external voice of truth from heaven (The Word)); yet Jesus who received the New covenant internally (word of God written on the heart), implied John the Baptist was the return of Elijah after the transfiguration on the mount. Much of the concept of the regeneration for the soul was left out of the 4 bible gospels, but is still preserved in the gospel of 12 which clearly pre-dates the 4 bible gospels we have today based on the discoveries revealed by the shared study. I recommend reading this for greater understanding. We have to remember that Jesus did nothing of himself unless it was given to him from His parent who is our parent regarding the spirit of God internal and Eternal (New Covenant)

This process is the only way for all souls that have ever existed to be judged equally and have the opportunity to be born again as Jesus stated, No one enters heaven unless they are born again. We know John the Baptist was beheaded prior to Pentecost when the first fruits (144,000) were born again and entered into the kingdom to be angels (messengers of God) speaking the good news of the Gospel (anointing of spirit/resurrection of the sons and daughters of Man) that they received. It's for this reason that they too like Jesus could heal with a word and since they were of the truth, could hear God's voice. With out the regeneration of the soul, the soul of John the Baptist who was the return of Elijah would never see the kingdom of heaven.

John the Baptist who was the return of the soul that was also in Elijah, would have either been re-generated to a new tabernacle of flesh to later in history experience the born again process, or was one of many who came back from the grave on the day of Jesus physical resurrection to meet with the apostles during the feast of weeks in Galilee in preparation for the day of Pentecost. John the Baptist having a pure body through repentance and able to communicate with God the parent before meeting Jesus prior to his baptism of water and spirit, would have likely been brought back from the dead at the physical resurrection since his temple (body) was a pure temple through the doctrine of Repentance that both He and Jesus taught by direction of the heavenly parent. Only Jesus the first born from the dead was at the time of Pentecost, able to baptize with the Fire (Spirit of God).

We know that that the Apostles after their Baptism of Spirit were also able to baptize with the Holy Spirit if the bible in its current state is telling the truth of the matter. Jesus did state that we would do all that He did and more. If this is so, then they too were of the Way, the Truth and the Life in every way that Jesus was. Born dead according to the Flesh in sin, then made alive through repentance by the wisdom of the Law and keeping that which is good. This allowed them to be re-connected with the spirit of God (spiritual re-birth).

It's not until Acts 11 that we see the Pagans (Hellenists) of Antioch who first called themselves Christians due to separating doctrinally from The Way, the Truth, and The life begin calling themselves Christians. A Prophet from Jerusalem (Agabus) who was part of the The Way Jesus started, went to meet the Christians of Antioch and upon meeting them, he prophesied a famine through out all the world. Could he have been talking about a spiritual Famine (men lacking the spirit of God) even though they (the Christians) recorded that it was in reference to a physical famine? The Christian who wanted to spread a Gospel they could not fully comprehend and not led by the spirit, would be the many Anti-Christ deceivers talked about by the apostle John. We have their written recordings in our bible today since the apostles would have taught what God was giving them in their ear to speak. They could hear God's voice and were living examples of the Way, Truth, and Life. (A living gospel of truth vs. the written half truths we received on paper which clearly suffered corruption by the speculations of our Christian forefathers at the pen of gentile scribes).

We are spiritual descendants of the Christians who separated from the Way, Truth, and Life. We are only of The Way as the apostles were, if we are born again.

This is the love of God, To learn how to love God by walking in His WAY, Truth (with out Error) and Life (Free from Sin), before physical death of the flesh so that our flesh and soul unified to the spirit of God, A purified temple by repentance and spirit, can enter into rest for the resurrection on the last day.

The sacrifice of Christ is to be our sacrifice in every way, He resisted sin through repentance and so should we just as the Apostles who followed His example. It's for this reason that the animal sacrifices could be abolished. We must die to self to save a brother.

Until the born again process occurs for me, this is merely a speculation built on the fragments of recorded history that have defined my perceptions to this understanding.

Very respectfully,

God Bless
« Last Edit: November 29, 2009, 08:34:43 PM by todd_vetter33 »
Logged

todd_vetter33

  • New Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2009, 08:37:38 PM »

Somebody is lying somewhere.
God is in control of what is truth and He surely would not let His truly dedicated people believe a lie that would go uncovered to the end of time by the Devil.

Take a chance on that belief if you wish-- but not me! The Bible is His Word and not Man"s!! God is responsible for His own Truth to man. The devil only comes up these side slots off the track. If man fails then it would be God's fault for not getting the truth across would'nt you say??? Now the Devil has a chance to enter back in on this theory.

If a lie can be found in the study, Please illustrate this with greater Historical evidence of Prophecy fulfillment so that truth can be established.  Based on this study being shared, it could be said that Calling the bible God's word is a speculation of Man that causes man to make a book their God instead of seeking the voice of truth that those of the truth should receive as all the prophets of old who received the truth from God. Jesus did say those of the truth would hear His voice, not read the written recordings of the men who did.  The men who relied on the written recordings were the men reading about the rightous men of the past before them who were of the truth and could hear God's voice.  Are we today any different than them? Are Christians telling a lie when they make a living word (voice of truth from heaven) a book?

We can see by the example of written historical recordings that Samuel who became a prophet studied the written recordings and worked in the temple for Eli,  For several years this happend and yet it goes on to say that he did not yet know the word of the Lord.  It was not until the Word of the Lord Spoke to him that he knew the Word of the Lord.  Do we know the word of the lord because we carry a bible that changes with every new version even when the bible says the Word of the Lord does not change and is Solid?

How can we take the gospel to the world with a word (the Bible) that changes with every new version and is not solid?

To say the bible is the word of God makes God look like a llar and gives men who were not raised in this tradition of belief a reason to think your insane and cannot see truth from error.  I only say this from experience from the Ex-athiest perspective due to the many denominations that build on the same book yet present different fables regarding the plan of salvation and cannot make a solid case for God due to lacking the promises Jesus made regarding the men who would be a part of his Church.  Jesus performed many miracles and said that his true followers would be able to do all that he did and more.  Do you know of any Christian with this ability who calls the bible God's word?

I don't say this to be rude, but apeal to common sense based on the facts that the evidence that Christian history presents.  I do thank you for your response.

Very repectfully

God Bless
« Last Edit: November 29, 2009, 09:05:14 PM by todd_vetter33 »
Logged

todd_vetter33

  • New Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2009, 08:54:27 PM »

ad
Logged

christined

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2009, 05:38:58 AM »


Quote
Because the flesh is simply a vessel that carries the soul, it's for this reason that God was quick to kill the flesh in the OT. It's the soul that God is interested in bringing out of the darkness of sin. It is stated that God knew us before we were born. This strongly implies a pre-existence of the soul before our existence in our current temporary tabernacle (flesh).

Whoa, where are you coming from?  The Bible does not imply that we had a soul before we were born.  We do have to be awake and watch out for wolves in lambs clothing.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2009, 06:16:42 AM »

Todd

This process is the only way for all souls that have ever existed to be judged equally and have the opportunity to be born again as Jesus stated, No one enters heaven unless they are born again. We know John the Baptist was beheaded prior to Pentecost when the first fruits (144,000) were born again and entered into the kingdom to be angels (messengers of God) speaking the good news of the Gospel (anointing of spirit/resurrection of the sons and daughters of Man) that they received. It's for this reason that they too like Jesus could heal with a word and since they were of the truth, could hear God's voice. With out the regeneration of the soul, the soul of John the Baptist who was the return of Elijah would never see the kingdom of heaven.


I have spot read several places to read one mans opinions and thoughts as he wrote. It is evident that most I read does not come to circle with rest of  Bibical references. The above is one place in particular. I was also reading about the widow rules. and yet can go into Proverbs and show discrepancies.

Lets just look at some common sense on the above quote.

The (144,000) issue this person presents is not a theory that can come circle with other references.

One must find a place for scripture where there is special Resurrection for those who followed the lamb and all their works as messengers do follow them. They will be in a "living state" at the (coming). So that would fit in.  This theory you present cannot conclude this as the 144,000 are now angels!!

First of all John was in vision of (future) for his presentation and not for the past presentation. The (144,000) was addressed to present future messengers in latter day time not past or Bibical time for truth to come to remembrance or finalized in knowing exact truth. As all in the History to come as you state was almost atheist in not knowing truth anymore.  John did not know future names of tribes in what part of new modern day countries that they would be scattered. So John wrote it simple and called it the 12 tribes so all would be included for modern day. IF you look at scripture it was  "sealed" or promised at that time by God to John for future latter day events that would be brought to completion for the truth of "message" to God's latterday. "second fruits".  Look at the scripture in REV 14. It says "were sealed" that is past tense (planned for future but sealed for a way of salvation in latter day made in John's day). Also at that time when messengers were to start their work was a time in sequence of prophecy when the 4 winds were held before God destroyed the earth at the last coming. There was still a message to be given. It was the 3rd Angels message for finality.!!  Nowhere in your texts is this addressed, so therefore when all is not accounted for in circle can you believe this theory. All is complete in a "golden thread" throughout and of course no man is capable of doing this except but by the HOLY SPIRIT and HIS use of man or "messengers". Yes, his messengers are in His knowledge and His Care and who "were appointed". Blessed are those that their works do follow them. (as they are laid to rest) now but will be raised in special Resurrection.

The firstfruits yes are in heaven, but they were human before they went and are human now. Angels are Angels.  I do not believe that God is going to make us into something we are not other then perfection at His coming of which he already created in us.  God gave man the duty or because of the "Love of God" to present it or preach to all Nations. Angels have their jobs to do but not this one....... They sound the trumpets! and other jobs.

Man can find any answer he connects to suit his own gratification and justifications. Man can find the most complicated intriguing issues that the Devil can instigate into the most complicated confusion to wrack ones mind into doubt. This is doubt of Holy Scripture.

In some places in this study I cannot determine if this is Mormon (because of the soul application) or Catholic! But it is evident that it is not of Holy Spirit. IF you have complete believe in this or venture into this ask yourself if all scripture is opened to your heart in a "golden unbroken" Thread. You will come across with an enlightening of words without being able to describe from knowing truth.  One can also study into oblivion with no road back as the mind was open to looking for one way to find doubt. I can state that if you are looking for it ..doubt you will find . It is the greatest reward for the devil as he is the best spinner of all truth. Did you not recognize it??????  I know that God will not let us all down that are meek, humble and take his word in "Simplicity".  Of course I have not read all your study or literature, but what I have was mind boggling to know which way to go if I was a widow.... with all that I would not know what I should do but sit and count over and over some beads for my own salvation. I am dense from there on out on if this is for real? It seems like self inflictions. I do believe though that woman should not be the preachers but some can be teachers unless direct calling. Woman have more then enough to do for God's work as to get behind the pulpit. as some men just are not cut out to do woman's work. I wish priorities could get straight. Then again as I read your study it is also a no no for woman to be behind the pulpit.  What Happened??? in this presented religion!!
« Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 06:31:00 AM by tinka »
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2009, 06:46:17 AM »

Todd,
One thing is very true that you state. Different versions of Bibles do misinform truth. Most do not detect and more light does not open for them.  Another trick of the devil using man's interpretations. Our own denomination does it and I do not like it and consider that is all the further some of our Evangelist can go.  Even though EGW did some study of that she does also warn of it. But who now a days take that warning?? In doing so one descreption is keeping the Trinity in darkness and the separate works of the Godhead in applications that open up great truths to know our Father even better.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 08:41:04 AM by tinka »
Logged

Emma

  • Guest
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2009, 10:37:29 AM »


Quote
Because the flesh is simply a vessel that carries the soul, it's for this reason that God was quick to kill the flesh in the OT. It's the soul that God is interested in bringing out of the darkness of sin. It is stated that God knew us before we were born. This strongly implies a pre-existence of the soul before our existence in our current temporary tabernacle (flesh).

Whoa, where are you coming from?  The Bible does not imply that we had a soul before we were born.  We do have to be awake and watch out for wolves in lambs clothing.

Well put, Christine.

Todd, if this belief - that man is essentially a spirit with a soul that exists/ed before and after his life in the flesh - forms an essential part of your beliefs, I predict you will not find many on this board in sympathy with those beliefs.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2009, 12:16:13 PM »

In fact that seems to be the belief of the Mormon about the soul. I had a Mormon explain to me that exact theory and that we were now living our 2nd chance of trial in the flesh. Now Todd, think about this. Only God and for short term the devil prevails with some power that is allowed till his end of days--can only have the ability to be visible or invisible.  We all are not incarnate as this theory would have to imply nor do we have that power. That phrase simply means we would be created as he visioned us.  If I was to create something I surely would have given it a thought how it would be. I do that with designing or making clothes, or simply creating something new in recipe.
Logged

Emma

  • Guest
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2009, 12:39:04 PM »

Agreed, Tinka.   As I understand the Mormon beliefs,they say that each of us has an eternal
spirit that  needs to live for a time in the flesh.   One Mormon once told me that still born babies
represent those who only need to acquire a body, but do not have to prove themselves living in the flesh on
earth.  I also remember hearing from the same person that when 'quickening' occurs - when the mother first
feels the baby move - is when the spirit enters the baby's body.

 (That is as I remember it, I heard that many years ago and I have not researched the matter.)
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2009, 04:07:56 PM »

That basically is what they proclaim and it is so far fetched from most portestants in fact so obsurb that I feel that is why Romney could not make it. The people looking at  all his money and prestige could not venture into that.  If he can't understand Bible better then that how could he run a country. If you want to watch intertainment the BYU is the place to watch on tv. They do not have anything but prestige in all things and flaunt it. As you noticed during the elections. Yep there good but good for what?? That also is why I watch intensly at how our programming is going. and while on the subject I do want to mention one thing that was on Hope channel.

I again thought I would turn the tv on while sewing. Right at that moment a 93 year old couple named Ray and Oneida came on the reunion program. They were going to sing and play piano. Never heard of them. My attention was taken and laid my sewing down...because all inspiration broke loose to tears again of happiness and joy that they sang there melody of Jesus and the Golden Bells. It was quite unbelievable. Never, Never on the Gaither hour would you have this most sincere and blessed thing happen before your eyes.  Then as I could not stop my bursting heart and tears I continued to watch. It seemed at this particular programming a complete quiteness, refined, immaculate flow of Holy Spirit. All charasmatic movement was quited except for two people. John Loma and the red haired woman they showed. All the rest were dressed so modestly appealing and finally inspiration was evident. Even the music was toned into melody with no show of performing. There was just serene feeling all in unity.  Finally I was so given a blessing and was so thankful as I got that old time feeling. It was not lost and I think that most on their felt it too. Mr. and Mrs. (Turner, I think that was the name) is something that no one else has and what an inspiration the Lord gave us all to watch them.  They should be on National tv as they top any inspiration. Nothing has ever been that I enjoyed more then those two. I am anxious to see them again.
Logged

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2009, 01:40:43 PM »

Please expand upon this statement, Tinka.  I am not sure what you mean oor on who's interpretation we can depend.  When it all comes down to it, isn't that all we have......man's interpretation?   i would think that we would have to test/determine that the man(or woman) was indeed lead by the Holy Spirit before accepting their "interpretation".  However, I might be mistaken.  So please clarify.  thanks!


Todd,
One thing is very true that you state. Different versions of Bibles do misinform truth. Most do not detect and more light does not open for them.  Another trick of the devil using man's interpretations. Our own denomination does it and I do not like it and consider that is all the further some of our Evangelist can go.  Even though EGW did some study of that she does also warn of it. But who now a days take that warning?? In doing so one descreption is keeping the Trinity in darkness and the separate works of the Godhead in applications that open up great truths to know our Father even better.
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: What are your thoughts on this? Are all churches Flawwed?
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2009, 03:14:24 PM »

Princess,

The old standard King James version is about the best standard to go by. all these later day translations and New versions do not hold correct meaning in many places. When just a lay person reads through one and then the others, you can pick up confusion almost immediately. But that is if you are really familiar with the King James old version.  EGW did read other version and came upon the same thing in discrepancies.  I would have to go into EGW Library on my computer in her writings if you have not read that yet.  Of course some of the translations really are far out to appease lower English slangs and ways of lower speech. I perfer the old English to bring up my speech as it is simple an beautiful and easy to follow references, but I also have the Greek and Hebrew versions as I relate it to the SDA commentary's. Too me the new age versions are so bad that when people read out loud from them you can tell the opinion's of man interpetation is now no longer inspired.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up